Dallas not sleeping during a snowstorm – 2001-ish
Overtime has always been kind of a hot topic in the architecture world. Over my (erch) 17 year career, I have worked three places that paid overtime – two big firms, which just paid straight time; and one which paid time and a half. That latter one ended up folding. I did, however, buy my first road bike, a 1999 Cannondale R300, exclusively with overtime money.
It seems from my personal experience that most firms call all of their employees “decision makers,” and therefore pay them a salary. That is all. There is some consensus that an employee should be paid overtime as an intern, meaning that once you are registered, you are no longer eligible (however supposedly one would be paid more).
So this article in Entrepreneur Magazine caught my eye this morning. It talked about how a new move in Washington would force more people to be paid overtime. This, according to Entrepreneur, would stifle new entrepreneurs, and would in effect make employers restrict employee’s hours. So, that employee who wants to put forth the extra effort won’t be allowed to… which not only stifles upward mobility, but also innovation.
Because everything stifles innovation.
Anyway, the first thought I had was: wow, this could have serious ramifications on our industry! On my old bosses, on startups, on me! Oh no! And if everyone got paid time and a half as an intern, who on earth would want to become a registered architect? The marketplace already shows that there is, if any, a negligible bump in compensation once someone becomes a registered architect. This would, in fact, keep people from progressing in their careers!
Then, I started to think about my experience. The architecture industry in particular has always reveled in working a ridiculous amount of hours. It is a badge of honor. From reading The Fountainhead to overnighters in studio to the workplace, putting in the hours has been what was most important. I worked for a group who particularly pushed such a mantra: if you’re not here working at 8:00 PM and later every night, you are not working hard enough.
That is where I worked when I decided to start going back to school (they had known this when I signed on). I had tons of papers to write, and I had definite cutoffs on some days when I had to go to class. Class was at 6:00PM which means (gasp) I had to leave AT FIVE O’CLOCK.
I still had to get my stuff done. I was at a (then) startup company, and had already worked many nights into the 2:00AM range. I couldn’t do it anymore. There are only 24 hours in each day that we all have, and I had made the commitment to myself that I was going to get a degree.
So something quite odd happened. After only 6 months or so of this (leaving on time, having to seriously cut back my hours, etc.), I was approached by a partner. He took me aside and said: “we’ve all been noticing you’ve been stepping it up lately.” I suppose I had been. I was figuring out how to do my work much more efficiently because I literally did not have the time to do it, and I was actually getting better in the process. I was actually making an impression by forcing myself to work less hours.
I hate the cliché work smarter not harder, but there is some truth in it to me: its not the number of hours you put into a job, but simply what your output is. Sometimes we all have to work late. However, I like to say that if someone can’t get their work done within a reasonable amount of hours in the day, it is because of either:
- Poor individual time management (who is writing a blog post at 9:40 this morning? Yes I will be working late today)
- Poor management (how long sir, have you been sitting on this, until you finally gave it to me to do?); or
- unreasonable expectations by a client, or some other outside uncontrollable force.
Everybody makes mistakes, that’s OK and normal, and sometimes you have to work late. But it shouldn’t be a badge of honor and it should most certainly not be a business model. If the real response to this new legislation really is to cut back hours, I would challenge business owners and overzealous employees to get more out of the time you have. And those who want to work long hours to excel? Do it on your own time if you think it is THAT important. Hours can be important, especially when starting out – because there are things that will take a young person four hours to do that a senior person can do in twenty minutes (in theory, that is why senior people get paid more. In theory). I see that as an investment in yourself, but the rest of your life also needs some time! For instance, at my last “real job,” I was working alone on the weekends in the office – because I chose to go to the gym in the middle of the day, cutting down my usable hours in the week. I feel like no one can keep someone from working; however, I don’t think sheer hours of work is what should get you ahead – it is the quality and quantity of your output.